Quote:
Originally Posted by Suhiro
I dont get your mentality ppl...you elect a president in a campaign and he sends your sons to die...for what? oil...money...bigger wallets...who in the current president office gives a shit about Osama bin laden...they just send in the troops like they`re doing something...4 years after you elect Bush the new elections start and he practicaly tells you "Im gonna kill your soldiers again, elect me!" and you still choose him...im sorry we in Croatia have a Jackass-Euro-ass-licking president but he doesnt kill us...Bush drasticaly sends the army to Iraq...for oil...all the shit Bush did he did for himself only and the citizens of the US take the blame(at least that 55%) cuz they chose him...and then the magical circle goes on...
this post isnt ment to insult USA or its people its ment to dig a hole deep enough to put Bush in it :mad: cuz i hate him...Amrica is a powerfull nation thats a factbut without good leadership it can do more damage than good to the world
|
You know... we COULD have let Hussain be, that would be a good idea too. Let him take Kuwait, but what if he didn't stop there? Let's say he got more power hungry and went after Iran. "Ok, you can have a little more power." Then he might go after Isreal...Where do you draw the line.
Now I'll be the first to agree that it was not ALL about this, of course there were alterior motives - and arguably greed for oil. But if the man wanted the entire mediterranean, began committing mass killings, etc - you have to draw the line somewhere...Go in, stomp his regiem, kill him if possible - but for God's sake, don't stay there for 3 friggin years.
Ok, I'm done ranting now