Final Fantasy Network
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Final Fantasy Network (http://www.ffnet.net/forum/index.php)
-   Final Fantasy X-2 (http://www.ffnet.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   FFX was better! Anyone agree? (http://www.ffnet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=318)

Hydra 02-23-2007 09:32 AM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
XD

Try taking on Angra Mainyu with two Berserkers and a Lady Luck. =O

Kat 02-24-2007 10:41 PM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
hey i killed that thing...
with 2 darkknights and a berserker ..
it was a loooong battle -_-"

dappa 02-25-2007 06:18 PM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Griever
Try it using nothing but the warrior dressphere and see how long it takes you to get pissed off.

XD
Yeah I have tried that before and it did piss me off, lol I wont be trying that again.

I tried defeating trema by having two warriors constantly using sentinel and the third one attacking. In theory the strategy should work but tremas speed used to do me before I could always select the sentinel command.

Kat 02-27-2007 12:33 AM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
i still never made it past Yunalesca's fiend,lmao

i gave up :rolleyes:

Hydra 02-27-2007 01:29 PM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kat
i still never made it past Yunalesca's fiend,lmao

i gave up :rolleyes:
Dang. XD

I almost gave up on Trema. Then I got a Gunner and two Dark Knights, instead of a Gunner, A Dark Knight, and a White Mage.

=D

Kat 02-27-2007 07:30 PM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
>.<

that gunner trick never seems to work for me :p
i actually haven't played X-2 in a while.

Keelus Mclain II 02-28-2007 09:34 PM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
This game was extremely hard.
I gave up whenever you had to look into that sphere to get completion
it got too hard

but this game was too complicated
I didnt like the idea of all the dresspheres
and i like completing everything so i tried to get 100percent on each dressphere

tooooo hard .

Shotgunnova 03-03-2007 05:58 AM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
I played through both games a few times, and it's really a toss-up for which I prefer more. FFX is more tolerable -- it's got half-decent characters, but a bland/linear story peppered with way more interesting sidequests; FFX-2 on the other hand has a nuanced battle/job system, but the fractured mission-based plot and overally "giggly" tone of everything makes it seem like a Charlie's Angels knockoff. FFX has got the most run-throughs, so I guess that's the poison I've picked the most.

Phoenix Flame 03-03-2007 06:01 AM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shotgunnova
I played through both games a few times, and it's really a toss-up for which I prefer more. FFX is more tolerable -- it's got half-decent characters, but a bland/linear story peppered with way more interesting sidequests; FFX-2 on the other hand has a nuanced battle/job system, but the fractured mission-based plot and overally "giggly" tone of everything makes it seem like a Charlie's Angels knockoff. FFX has got the most run-throughs, so I guess that's the poison I've picked the most.
;hai


...again I couldn't have... oh! NM! XD

darkshadow2247 03-03-2007 05:17 PM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shotgunnova
I played through both games a few times, and it's really a toss-up for which I prefer more. FFX is more tolerable -- it's got half-decent characters, but a bland/linear story peppered with way more interesting sidequests; FFX-2 on the other hand has a nuanced battle/job system, but the fractured mission-based plot and overally "giggly" tone of everything makes it seem like a Charlie's Angels knockoff. FFX has got the most run-throughs, so I guess that's the poison I've picked the most.
That's because the game is nothing but mini-games with an RPG battle system throw into the mix.

Shotgunnova 03-04-2007 05:36 AM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
That's half of it. Making things optional and mission-based really gives those 'events' a mini-game feel, which only adds to the often comical tone of everything. The only bone I have to pick with the battle system is that some abilities get too samey -- I'm a status effect junkie, but the overlap in some cases detracted from the job-system experience.

Gackt Camui 03-08-2007 12:59 PM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
I totally agree that FF-X was better.

dappa 08-29-2007 02:30 PM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
I think that ffx-2 is beautifully presented though. Its a shame they dropped alot of the features of the original game e.g customizing armour.

I liked the fact that characters sorta move position in battle too givin the battle a little more realism.

But this game will never beat final fantasy 10

Gumdrop 04-08-2010 06:25 AM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squall Leonhart (Post 11204)
I think it's safe to say everyone likes 10 more ;)
Noes.

X-2 was a better game imo. Not a better RPG, but a better game. I liked how it didn't take itself seriously and it was very fun :)

clief101_ 04-08-2010 09:38 AM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
X-2 and XII are the worst FF games ever made!! at least thats my oppinion in the 1's that ive played

Gumdrop 04-09-2010 10:24 AM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
XII is my fave one :p either xii, or 9. Don't think 10-2 is that good, bit I like it more than X

clief101_ 04-10-2010 01:48 AM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
i didnt like XII. IX is 1 of my fav ones, i thought it was a realy good game

Masamune85 08-11-2015 11:06 AM
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
 
Yes. 10 was most definitely better. this one is visually impressive. tho. Don't really like the whole changing jobs in the middle of battle. can't hardly stay focused . lol


All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:14 PM.
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FFNET.NET