Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
XD
Try taking on Angra Mainyu with two Berserkers and a Lady Luck. =O |
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
hey i killed that thing...
with 2 darkknights and a berserker .. it was a loooong battle -_-" |
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
Quote:
I tried defeating trema by having two warriors constantly using sentinel and the third one attacking. In theory the strategy should work but tremas speed used to do me before I could always select the sentinel command. |
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
i still never made it past Yunalesca's fiend,lmao
i gave up :rolleyes: |
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
Quote:
I almost gave up on Trema. Then I got a Gunner and two Dark Knights, instead of a Gunner, A Dark Knight, and a White Mage. =D |
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
>.<
that gunner trick never seems to work for me :p i actually haven't played X-2 in a while. |
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
This game was extremely hard.
I gave up whenever you had to look into that sphere to get completion it got too hard but this game was too complicated I didnt like the idea of all the dresspheres and i like completing everything so i tried to get 100percent on each dressphere tooooo hard . |
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
I played through both games a few times, and it's really a toss-up for which I prefer more. FFX is more tolerable -- it's got half-decent characters, but a bland/linear story peppered with way more interesting sidequests; FFX-2 on the other hand has a nuanced battle/job system, but the fractured mission-based plot and overally "giggly" tone of everything makes it seem like a Charlie's Angels knockoff. FFX has got the most run-throughs, so I guess that's the poison I've picked the most.
|
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
Quote:
...again I couldn't have... oh! NM! XD |
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
Quote:
|
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
That's half of it. Making things optional and mission-based really gives those 'events' a mini-game feel, which only adds to the often comical tone of everything. The only bone I have to pick with the battle system is that some abilities get too samey -- I'm a status effect junkie, but the overlap in some cases detracted from the job-system experience.
|
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
I totally agree that FF-X was better.
|
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
I think that ffx-2 is beautifully presented though. Its a shame they dropped alot of the features of the original game e.g customizing armour.
I liked the fact that characters sorta move position in battle too givin the battle a little more realism. But this game will never beat final fantasy 10 |
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
Quote:
X-2 was a better game imo. Not a better RPG, but a better game. I liked how it didn't take itself seriously and it was very fun :) |
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
X-2 and XII are the worst FF games ever made!! at least thats my oppinion in the 1's that ive played
|
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
XII is my fave one :p either xii, or 9. Don't think 10-2 is that good, bit I like it more than X
|
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
i didnt like XII. IX is 1 of my fav ones, i thought it was a realy good game
|
Re: FFX was better! Anyone agree?
Yes. 10 was most definitely better. this one is visually impressive. tho. Don't really like the whole changing jobs in the middle of battle. can't hardly stay focused . lol
|
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FFNET.NET